Rarely do I watch BET. Growing up, I thought it just wasn’t a good network, mediocre at best. The news show was sub par, the reporting even worse. And the selection of shows, personally, I thought were lacking in substance and often times talent. As time progressed, and ownership changed hands, it slipped even further into the back of my mind as a station to watch only if, emphasis on the only, they were showing The Color Purple, Harlem Nights, or some other movie of merit. When Aaron McGruder’s "Hunger Strike" Boondocks episode depicted his thoughts on BET was banned I thought that it was censorship taken too far as the episode was, albeit sensationalized in a way that portrays McGruder’s wit and critical tongue, accurate. Last night, I watched the BET Awards, not to support BET, but to see how they would (mis)handle the death of Michael Jackson. I was not mistaken in my initial skepticism of how they would incorporate the death of Michael Jackson into the makeup of the show. A friend said that it felt as if Michael’s death was used more as a hook to get a larger audience than anything else. In many ways, I agree. I will not touch on that here because the point of this post is to reflect on at least (and sadly at most) one positive thing that I saw at the BET Awards last night: the time taken to honor those whose life story and work deserves more attention that it receives.
I salute those at BET who insisted on including those segments of the show to pay homage to members of the Black community outside of the music and entertainment industry. Jamie Foxx introduced Mayor-Elect James Young who will serve as mayor of Philadelphia, Mississippi, site where three Civil Rights workers were killed in 1964 and a site where tumultuous, racial tensions persist—in other words, a place where the KKK was once truly king. We, as a nation, heard about those individuals who started and maintain Food from the Hood (FFTH), a community based organization that serves to educate (in the larger sense of the word) others outside the classroom yet still within the community. We heard about how this community based organization is able to provide scholarship moneys for youth to go beyond the boundaries of their neighborhood or city for school. We, as an audience, as a collective body, were also reminded of the three friends—Sampson Davis, George Jenkins and Rameck Hunt—who beat the odds to become successful doctors and how they then, with their new positions in life, work to help others follow in their footsteps. So, I say, kudos to BET. I also encourage all to look up some of the work of these individuals as it is important to not only be aware of their work but also be cognizant of the work being done.
Rarely are minority groups, especially Blacks, able to control their image. Rarer still do minorities have a medium through which to show our “better half,” our “better side,” for these moments are usually relegated to spaces with smaller audiences and narrower ranges. This is especially true when there is no dancing or singing involved (which is also a topic for discussion). The media harks on the dark side, the side some of wish to forget, to disassociate from: the crime, the desolate living conditions that “the poor” caused to fall upon themselves, the crime, the high dropout rates, and the crime. This small glimmer of light in an otherwise dismally dark show made enduring it worthwhile. I say again, kudos to BET.
goodness, that show was a trainwreck. i definitely agree that the portions you described were the highlight of the evening and it was exciting to see jaimie foxx urge the crowd to get excited about those presentations.
ReplyDeletei was stunned how completely the abuse in michael jackson's life was omitted from the show - both the abuse he perpetrated and the abuse he received at the hands of his father. to see joe jackson not only present but applauded from the stage by multiple people, including the CEO of BET, was extremely uncomfortable for me given the horrific abuse he inflicted on his son. it made me dramatically lower my expectations for the discussions of childhood abuse and cycles of abuse that i was hoping might be generated by his death.
one other good thing from last night was something that was missing - chris brown's planned tribute performance was cut, likely because jay-z threatened to cancel his performance if chris brown performed. having chris brown there would have strengthened the message that abuse is unimportant and irrelevant to musical stardom still further.
I have not supported BET for a very long time. Way back when, BET held so much promise to be so much more. However, there is no intelligent creativity behind the scenes at that network, if one can call it a network.
ReplyDeleteAs far as the BET Awards, it's a modern day minstrel show. The saddest part in all of this? BET will re-run the show multiple times, from now until the next BET Awards.
I agree with both comments. It is painful to watch BET. It really could have been something worthwhile, both the channel and the recent Awards show. I think that Jay Z was right to protest if they would have allowed Chris Brown to perform. What the hell would that have said?
ReplyDeleteI am already mad that so many people have amnesia about Michael Jackson, his family, and all the shit we said about him that it is infuriating. I mean, if we are going to be critical we have to be honest, irrespective of the situation. For being critical and honest does not mean being insensitive. Why Joe Jackson was there smiling like a Cheshire cat, why the presenters saluted him are beyond me.
I never thought of BET's programming as minstrelsy before, but the parallels are there.
The reason I didn't blog about the actual show like Ron Mexico's more colorful "notes and observations" (http://www.xxlmag.com/online/?p=50643) was because I was so happy that BET actually got something right. Finally, after all these years, they managed to scrape up five minutes of quality television.
Thanks for the comments. They are much appreciated.
Although I try (very hard) to appreciate the very few things that BET does right (once in a blue moon), I agree with McGruder and/or Huey Freeman that BET, as a whole, is destructive. I even agree with the portrayal of BET execs as conspirators who are trying to destroy Black America.
ReplyDeleteI would start a hunger strike, but a starving African doesn't make much news these days, or ever, so I guess I'll have to resort to plan B... kidnap the execs and force them to admit that they really do want to destroy black people's psyche. This message will self-destruct in 5...4...3...2, wait, where's the self-destruct button?
good post. didn't watch show, but this went under the radar of many blog postings that expressed total outrage about it.
ReplyDeleteone small, but important beef on language --- people of color have never been a minority on this planet and so when you use that word you subconsciously demean and diminish, which undermines your excellent intent and credibility as a commenter.
if that weren't in there, i would link to you on my other online communities!
Susan, thanks for the comment. I was disappointed as well that this was skated over by some bloggers who wanted to berate BET. I think it was put on the back burner the same way Jackson's death, in many respects, was set aside in the actual show.
ReplyDeleteWith respect to your comment, I understand where you are coming from in some respects but, in response, would say two things. First, I must be clear that I refer to the US where minority is a term I use to capture demographic characteristics of groups in relation to the whole. And following that, I think it risky to use “people of color” as a blanket statement irrespective of social context as different countries or even regions for that matter (social environments more generally) have different definitions of “color.” Take Brazil for instance or many countries of the Caribbean. Again, I understand that there is an argument for placing any non-white into the category of people of color but am not quite sure if that is fair when Earth is context. Thoughts?
Second, minority status does not translate into status of a minority for some races while it does for others. When I refer to minority groups, as I do specifically in this post, I am referring to those, again, in the United States. Yes, it is true that given the birth rate of minority groups, whites will no longer be a majority group in the US, but I believe that thinking along these lines is a mistake. Blacks, Latinos, Asians, Native Americans, the list continues, are not one group that think and act along similar lines. There are divisions in each group and that includes whites. So I defend my use of minority; to me minority speaks to the makeup of the country I use as background for my analysis, the US.
Again thanks for the comment. We appreciate it (even if language prevents you from spreading the word as I too believe that words are always more than just words).
I think the show was all over the place. There were some great moments - Foxx's opening, the film clip, and a few performances - but there was also too many time-fillers. I too only watch BET occasionally.
ReplyDeleteAs far as Joe Jackson being presented with an award, let's get a grip here. The guy just lost his son, and on top of that raised a talented family. Sure he wasn't the best father but you don't ram that down his throat at a time like this. I'm pretty sure he realizes his errors and has paid for them by way of how his family treats him now.
As far as Michael's errors. Give me a break. The guy paid dearly. He faced trial, was acquitted, and lost all prospects of being the "'80s Michael."
John, agreed there were some highlights and that most of the show was filler. However, with respect to Joe Jackson, the death of Michael should not be a pardon for all past sins. I do not even begin to think that everyone that night should have been "Joe, this is your fault." That would be have been tactless no matter how true you think it is (or isn't). As I said earlier, I was just a bit shocked with all the happy-go-luckiness that was on stage that night.
ReplyDeleteWith respect to Michael, hell, like Quincy Jones said, fame is a beast. It can be your best friend in the best of times and tear you out at the worst. Look at how many child stars, irrespective of race, have suffered similar fates of decline after their ten seconds of fame were over. I think the differences between them were thier levels of fame and their "social transgression." And what I mean by that is "bleaching your skin" and "going white" (not my argument) is different from just being a crackhead.
But, the post was aimed to highlight the one good thing, in my opinion, that the Award show got right. I knew when watching it that Michael's death and the rest of the show would overshadow the work of those highlighted. I just had to give them a shoutout.